Open Access
Table 6
Comparison results of comprehensive performance of different three‑dimensional modeling methods.
| Evaluation dimension | Specific indicators | The method in this paper | Method in reference [5] | Method in reference [6] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geometric accuracy | Average point error (mm) | 23.5 | 12.8 | 48.9 |
| Point cloud integrity (%) | 98.7 | 90.2 | 95.3 | |
| Simulation accuracy | Average relative error of stress in static analysis (%) | 4.67 | 16.82 | 19.45 |
| Relative error of fundamental frequency calculation (%) | 3.2 | 5.1 | 7.8 | |
| Modeling efficiency | Data acquisition time (h) | 2.5 | 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Total time consumption of model preprocessing (h) | 6.0 | 10.0 | 8.5 | |
| Total time consumption of the whole process (h) | 12.7 | 42.1 | 38.5 |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.